Comment by YetAnotherNick
7 days ago
> HN threads confidently asserting
I have never seen any thread that unanimously asserts this. Even if they do, having HN/reddit asserting something as evidence is wrong way to look at things.
7 days ago
> HN threads confidently asserting
I have never seen any thread that unanimously asserts this. Even if they do, having HN/reddit asserting something as evidence is wrong way to look at things.
Okay, but I'm legitimately unclear on the argument for $60M - $300M value here, given it isn't articulated at all.
HN is full of AI agents hype posts. I am yet to see legitimate and functional agent orchestration solving real problems, whether it is scale or velocity.
You're confused. If you hype AI here you lose karma.
The top comment here is one by straydusk. Their profile says: data expert, AI explorer.
HN is full of anti hype posts as well. If I were to estimate there are more posts of anti hype than of hype.