Comment by Nextgrid 10 days ago SSH without proper key management offers marginal benefits compared to telnet. 4 comments Nextgrid Reply Quarrel 10 days ago However bad your key management is, unless you're on an older ssh that will let you choose to use the "None" cipher, you're still better off than telnet! signalblur 10 days ago Right? It doesn’t even make sense - on any actively updated ssh agent you’d have to go out of your way.Also - SSH offers more than just encryption, but also data integrity - you can modify / manipulate a telnet session in ways you just can’t via SSH trumpdong 9 days ago [dead] gzread 10 days ago [dead]
Quarrel 10 days ago However bad your key management is, unless you're on an older ssh that will let you choose to use the "None" cipher, you're still better off than telnet! signalblur 10 days ago Right? It doesn’t even make sense - on any actively updated ssh agent you’d have to go out of your way.Also - SSH offers more than just encryption, but also data integrity - you can modify / manipulate a telnet session in ways you just can’t via SSH trumpdong 9 days ago [dead]
signalblur 10 days ago Right? It doesn’t even make sense - on any actively updated ssh agent you’d have to go out of your way.Also - SSH offers more than just encryption, but also data integrity - you can modify / manipulate a telnet session in ways you just can’t via SSH
However bad your key management is, unless you're on an older ssh that will let you choose to use the "None" cipher, you're still better off than telnet!
Right? It doesn’t even make sense - on any actively updated ssh agent you’d have to go out of your way.
Also - SSH offers more than just encryption, but also data integrity - you can modify / manipulate a telnet session in ways you just can’t via SSH
[dead]
[dead]