← Back to context Comment by Nextgrid 11 days ago SSH without proper key management offers marginal benefits compared to telnet. 4 comments Nextgrid Reply Quarrel 11 days ago However bad your key management is, unless you're on an older ssh that will let you choose to use the "None" cipher, you're still better off than telnet! signalblur 11 days ago Right? It doesn’t even make sense - on any actively updated ssh agent you’d have to go out of your way.Also - SSH offers more than just encryption, but also data integrity - you can modify / manipulate a telnet session in ways you just can’t via SSH trumpdong 10 days ago [dead] gzread 11 days ago [dead]
Quarrel 11 days ago However bad your key management is, unless you're on an older ssh that will let you choose to use the "None" cipher, you're still better off than telnet! signalblur 11 days ago Right? It doesn’t even make sense - on any actively updated ssh agent you’d have to go out of your way.Also - SSH offers more than just encryption, but also data integrity - you can modify / manipulate a telnet session in ways you just can’t via SSH trumpdong 10 days ago [dead]
signalblur 11 days ago Right? It doesn’t even make sense - on any actively updated ssh agent you’d have to go out of your way.Also - SSH offers more than just encryption, but also data integrity - you can modify / manipulate a telnet session in ways you just can’t via SSH
However bad your key management is, unless you're on an older ssh that will let you choose to use the "None" cipher, you're still better off than telnet!
Right? It doesn’t even make sense - on any actively updated ssh agent you’d have to go out of your way.
Also - SSH offers more than just encryption, but also data integrity - you can modify / manipulate a telnet session in ways you just can’t via SSH
[dead]
[dead]