Comment by ozkatz 16 hours ago correlation does not imply causation 3 comments ozkatz Reply joshlemer 13 hours ago But it is evidence for causation. lucketone 13 hours ago Is it? joshlemer 12 hours ago Yes. If A is correlated with B, is A more likely to cause B than if A is not correlated with B? Clearly yes.
joshlemer 13 hours ago But it is evidence for causation. lucketone 13 hours ago Is it? joshlemer 12 hours ago Yes. If A is correlated with B, is A more likely to cause B than if A is not correlated with B? Clearly yes.
lucketone 13 hours ago Is it? joshlemer 12 hours ago Yes. If A is correlated with B, is A more likely to cause B than if A is not correlated with B? Clearly yes.
joshlemer 12 hours ago Yes. If A is correlated with B, is A more likely to cause B than if A is not correlated with B? Clearly yes.
But it is evidence for causation.
Is it?
Yes. If A is correlated with B, is A more likely to cause B than if A is not correlated with B? Clearly yes.