← Back to context Comment by ozkatz 13 hours ago correlation does not imply causation 3 comments ozkatz Reply joshlemer 9 hours ago But it is evidence for causation. lucketone 9 hours ago Is it? joshlemer 9 hours ago Yes. If A is correlated with B, is A more likely to cause B than if A is not correlated with B? Clearly yes.
joshlemer 9 hours ago But it is evidence for causation. lucketone 9 hours ago Is it? joshlemer 9 hours ago Yes. If A is correlated with B, is A more likely to cause B than if A is not correlated with B? Clearly yes.
lucketone 9 hours ago Is it? joshlemer 9 hours ago Yes. If A is correlated with B, is A more likely to cause B than if A is not correlated with B? Clearly yes.
joshlemer 9 hours ago Yes. If A is correlated with B, is A more likely to cause B than if A is not correlated with B? Clearly yes.
But it is evidence for causation.
Is it?
Yes. If A is correlated with B, is A more likely to cause B than if A is not correlated with B? Clearly yes.