Comment by Aerroon

The important point is why AI generated works aren't given copyright protection - it's because the human isn't considered to be the author.

This is what the copyright office said about the comic with AI generated images:

>Rather than a tool that Ms. Kashtanova controlled and guided to reach her desired image, Midjourney generates images in an unpredictable way. Accordingly, Midjourney users are not the “authors” for copyright purposes of the images the technology generates.

If the human involved isn't considered the author of the work, then shouldn't that also have an impact on liability?