← Back to context Comment by azan_ 11 days ago Approx. 5% of all cancers in US are caused by CTs 9 comments azan_ Reply ErroneousBosh 11 days ago [citation needed] lostlogin 11 days ago 5% seems a bit high, but we are nearly there.https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publicat... ErroneousBosh 11 days ago I think they're reading too much into it.How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"? 6 replies →
ErroneousBosh 11 days ago [citation needed] lostlogin 11 days ago 5% seems a bit high, but we are nearly there.https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publicat... ErroneousBosh 11 days ago I think they're reading too much into it.How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"? 6 replies →
lostlogin 11 days ago 5% seems a bit high, but we are nearly there.https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publicat... ErroneousBosh 11 days ago I think they're reading too much into it.How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"? 6 replies →
ErroneousBosh 11 days ago I think they're reading too much into it.How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"? 6 replies →
[citation needed]
5% seems a bit high, but we are nearly there.
https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publicat...
I think they're reading too much into it.
How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"?
6 replies →