Comment by tgma
12 days ago
Some of the tactics used were questionable and basically looked like shakedowns for pushing the corporate targets to donate to his entities which then softened his stance around the alleged suboptimal civil rights situations.
Okay. Any organizations that represent the underrepresented not do this, or is there an alternative approach in your opinion?
Alternative approach to steering business to your family (Budweiser franchise) and affiliates (Pepsi underwriting) in exchange for stopping a boycott?
You ask as if these conflicts of interest aren't avoidable.
Are you implying that Jackson had ownership in either of these companies? If so, have you any sources to support this claim?
TJ Rodgers' called out this guy years ago.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/cypress-ceo-strikes-back-at-ja...