Comment by vidarh
5 days ago
The point is that whether it does what you tell it in a single iteration is less important then whether it avoids stupid mistakes. Any serious use will put it in a harness.
5 days ago
The point is that whether it does what you tell it in a single iteration is less important then whether it avoids stupid mistakes. Any serious use will put it in a harness.
My point is that you misread the comment you replied to. (By the way, on page 2 of the paper: "we evaluate each LLM only within its corresponding harness.")
> My point is that you misread the comment you replied to.
I'm not the person you replied to.
> (By the way, on page 2 of the paper: "we evaluate each LLM only within its corresponding harness.")
That has zero relevance to my comment or to the type of harnesses I talked about in the comment you replied to, nor in my comment up-thread.
The only people I have replied to in this thread were vidarh, vidarh, and now vidarh again. I thought you were all the same person?