Comment by nickburns 4 days ago Zerconf ≠ zero trust. The difference could not be more material in this context. 2 comments nickburns Reply tonyplee 4 days ago If both sides of your ssh tunnel (pub,private keys) are under your control, in theory, that's "zero trust".Unless one considers the meta data such as src/dest IP are visible to Tailscale sw.Right? nickburns 4 days ago 'Zero trust' has a technical definition that's not really relevant here. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_trust.The concept is separate from 'zero config' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-configuration_networking), which Tailscale's low technical barrier to entry evokes.
tonyplee 4 days ago If both sides of your ssh tunnel (pub,private keys) are under your control, in theory, that's "zero trust".Unless one considers the meta data such as src/dest IP are visible to Tailscale sw.Right? nickburns 4 days ago 'Zero trust' has a technical definition that's not really relevant here. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_trust.The concept is separate from 'zero config' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-configuration_networking), which Tailscale's low technical barrier to entry evokes.
nickburns 4 days ago 'Zero trust' has a technical definition that's not really relevant here. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_trust.The concept is separate from 'zero config' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-configuration_networking), which Tailscale's low technical barrier to entry evokes.
If both sides of your ssh tunnel (pub,private keys) are under your control, in theory, that's "zero trust".
Unless one considers the meta data such as src/dest IP are visible to Tailscale sw.
Right?
'Zero trust' has a technical definition that's not really relevant here. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_trust.
The concept is separate from 'zero config' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-configuration_networking), which Tailscale's low technical barrier to entry evokes.