Comment by saagarjha

6 days ago

Bringing up Rust as an obvious alternative is not toxic.

There's already a stereotype that Rust people will just carpet bomb any discussion with aggressively promoting Rust, people expect it to happen at this point and it just annoys people.

So I think it probably meets the threshold of "toxic", but more importantly - it's not effective. Everyone and their dog has already heard of Rust, aggressive proselytising is not going to help drive Rust adoption, it's just pissing people off

  • It's probably the same people who were proselitysing blockchain and now are proselytising "AI"?

    • I think that's more of a financial grift in a lot of cases (how many pie-eyed AI evangelists turn out to be running some "AI startup" or otherwise have skin in the game).

      The rust thing is more like actual religious evangelism, like having Jehovah's Witnesses knocking on the door. They have seen the light and you haven't

it's toxic because of how it sometimes materializes:

- predictable

- incessant

- with belittling/reductionist/arrogant/elitist/combative phrasings

- handwaving rust shortcomings and tradeoffs