Comment by dmoy 20 hours ago $8000 is considerably above median income, no? 2 comments dmoy Reply InkCanon 20 hours ago Yes. Bluntly put, the government maximizes residence of high net worth individuals, and a 37% forced purchase of low interest bonds would be outrageous to them. eru 12 hours ago Also Singapore is reasonably good about applying paternalism mostly to the poor.(I say, mostly, because they still don't allow rich people to take arbitrary drugs. Unless you count getting a doctor to give you a prescription.)
InkCanon 20 hours ago Yes. Bluntly put, the government maximizes residence of high net worth individuals, and a 37% forced purchase of low interest bonds would be outrageous to them. eru 12 hours ago Also Singapore is reasonably good about applying paternalism mostly to the poor.(I say, mostly, because they still don't allow rich people to take arbitrary drugs. Unless you count getting a doctor to give you a prescription.)
eru 12 hours ago Also Singapore is reasonably good about applying paternalism mostly to the poor.(I say, mostly, because they still don't allow rich people to take arbitrary drugs. Unless you count getting a doctor to give you a prescription.)
Yes. Bluntly put, the government maximizes residence of high net worth individuals, and a 37% forced purchase of low interest bonds would be outrageous to them.
Also Singapore is reasonably good about applying paternalism mostly to the poor.
(I say, mostly, because they still don't allow rich people to take arbitrary drugs. Unless you count getting a doctor to give you a prescription.)