← Back to context Comment by dmoy 3 days ago $8000 is considerably above median income, no? 2 comments dmoy Reply InkCanon 3 days ago Yes. Bluntly put, the government maximizes residence of high net worth individuals, and a 37% forced purchase of low interest bonds would be outrageous to them. eru 3 days ago Also Singapore is reasonably good about applying paternalism mostly to the poor.(I say, mostly, because they still don't allow rich people to take arbitrary drugs. Unless you count getting a doctor to give you a prescription.)
InkCanon 3 days ago Yes. Bluntly put, the government maximizes residence of high net worth individuals, and a 37% forced purchase of low interest bonds would be outrageous to them. eru 3 days ago Also Singapore is reasonably good about applying paternalism mostly to the poor.(I say, mostly, because they still don't allow rich people to take arbitrary drugs. Unless you count getting a doctor to give you a prescription.)
eru 3 days ago Also Singapore is reasonably good about applying paternalism mostly to the poor.(I say, mostly, because they still don't allow rich people to take arbitrary drugs. Unless you count getting a doctor to give you a prescription.)
Yes. Bluntly put, the government maximizes residence of high net worth individuals, and a 37% forced purchase of low interest bonds would be outrageous to them.
Also Singapore is reasonably good about applying paternalism mostly to the poor.
(I say, mostly, because they still don't allow rich people to take arbitrary drugs. Unless you count getting a doctor to give you a prescription.)