Comment by reliabilityguy
3 days ago
> not even bothering to dogwhistle
So, basically, you are saying that they are openly racist?
Is there any evidence of this?
> If you need a source for that you haven’t been following the news.
Nice deflection. You are the one making outlandish claims, so the proof is on you and not the “news” that someone is supposed to follow.
You want concrete proof? Vasquez Perdomo v Noem is your proof. The Supreme Court effectively legitimised racial profiling.
> You want concrete proof?
Yes.
> Vasquez Perdomo v Noem is your proof.
This court case has nothing to do with the claim made that US government explicitly stated that they want to promote racists and fringe-right ideology among our allies.
I don’t know about the rest of Europe but your administration has repeatedly been promoting the AFD in Germany - most prominently your vice president.
The AFD is recognised as a far right party by the German state and is being investigated for anti-democratic activities and goals.
7 replies →
The court case established the ability for ICE to go and harass anyone who they think looks like they're potentially a migrant. Hmm, I wonder what they'll use to profile those people...
9 replies →