Comment by nottorp 1 day ago And is it better with bad cooling? 5 comments nottorp Reply aaronmdjones 1 day ago It's better with absolutely no cooling. It doesn't even consume (and thus dissipate) 100mW flat-out. nottorp 2 hours ago Maybe they should have branded it differently … whiskers 1 hour ago They did, it's the Raspberry Pi Pico (as opposed to the Raspberry Pi) as a dev board or the RP2350 (as opposed to the BCMXXXX) as a chip. whiskers 1 day ago Yes.
aaronmdjones 1 day ago It's better with absolutely no cooling. It doesn't even consume (and thus dissipate) 100mW flat-out. nottorp 2 hours ago Maybe they should have branded it differently … whiskers 1 hour ago They did, it's the Raspberry Pi Pico (as opposed to the Raspberry Pi) as a dev board or the RP2350 (as opposed to the BCMXXXX) as a chip.
nottorp 2 hours ago Maybe they should have branded it differently … whiskers 1 hour ago They did, it's the Raspberry Pi Pico (as opposed to the Raspberry Pi) as a dev board or the RP2350 (as opposed to the BCMXXXX) as a chip.
whiskers 1 hour ago They did, it's the Raspberry Pi Pico (as opposed to the Raspberry Pi) as a dev board or the RP2350 (as opposed to the BCMXXXX) as a chip.
It's better with absolutely no cooling. It doesn't even consume (and thus dissipate) 100mW flat-out.
Maybe they should have branded it differently …
They did, it's the Raspberry Pi Pico (as opposed to the Raspberry Pi) as a dev board or the RP2350 (as opposed to the BCMXXXX) as a chip.
Yes.