← Back to context Comment by nottorp 7 days ago And is it better with bad cooling? 6 comments nottorp Reply aaronmdjones 7 days ago It's better with absolutely no cooling. It doesn't even consume (and thus dissipate) 100mW flat-out. nottorp 5 days ago Maybe they should have branded it differently … whiskers 5 days ago They did, it's the Raspberry Pi Pico (as opposed to the Raspberry Pi) as a dev board or the RP2350 (as opposed to the BCMXXXX) as a chip. 1 reply → whiskers 6 days ago Yes.
aaronmdjones 7 days ago It's better with absolutely no cooling. It doesn't even consume (and thus dissipate) 100mW flat-out. nottorp 5 days ago Maybe they should have branded it differently … whiskers 5 days ago They did, it's the Raspberry Pi Pico (as opposed to the Raspberry Pi) as a dev board or the RP2350 (as opposed to the BCMXXXX) as a chip. 1 reply →
nottorp 5 days ago Maybe they should have branded it differently … whiskers 5 days ago They did, it's the Raspberry Pi Pico (as opposed to the Raspberry Pi) as a dev board or the RP2350 (as opposed to the BCMXXXX) as a chip. 1 reply →
whiskers 5 days ago They did, it's the Raspberry Pi Pico (as opposed to the Raspberry Pi) as a dev board or the RP2350 (as opposed to the BCMXXXX) as a chip. 1 reply →
It's better with absolutely no cooling. It doesn't even consume (and thus dissipate) 100mW flat-out.
Maybe they should have branded it differently …
They did, it's the Raspberry Pi Pico (as opposed to the Raspberry Pi) as a dev board or the RP2350 (as opposed to the BCMXXXX) as a chip.
1 reply →
Yes.