Comment by thrance

5 days ago

Weren't you the one telling us X.com should replace legacy media? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46504404

I think it's very telling how you went to Reddit first when complaining about politics on social media, one of the only big ones that still hasn't been completely invaded by MAGA sycophants. Just admit you take no issues with politics on social media, you just want them to align with your views.

[flagged]

  • Sure it does. https://techcrunch.com/2024/05/14/on-elons-whim-x-now-treats...

    > If you write the words “cis” or “cisgender” on X, you might be served this full-screen message: “This post contains language that may be considered a slur by X and could be used in a harmful manner in violation of our rules,” the warning says. You can continue to publish the post or delete it.

  • It's pretty funny how you tried to completely sidestep the accusation, but still managed to confirm it

  • No online platform has free speech. No online platform should have free speech. Besides, free speech is a constitutional / legal thing, a platform does not need to host it.

    Claiming Twitter has free speech (as in absolutist, as in you can say what you want and won't get banned) means you've drunk the kool-aid / accepted the propaganda.

  • Have you opened the second link? It's mind-boggling how anyone can still claim that.

    • All of those topics can be found other places if you look, then it updates your algorithm. I mean vaccine skepticism? Youtube and instagram have a million videos