← Back to context Comment by jbxntuehineoh 3 days ago Oh no! Not property damage! We can't possibly go that far! 1 comment jbxntuehineoh Reply JumpCrisscross 3 days ago > Not property damage! We can't possibly go that far!Anyone can go that far. The question is if it’s smart. The answer is it’s not. Acting out one’s need for machismo on a good cause is just selfish.If I were a Flock PR person, I’d be waiting for someone to pull a stunt like this. (Better: they shoot it.)
JumpCrisscross 3 days ago > Not property damage! We can't possibly go that far!Anyone can go that far. The question is if it’s smart. The answer is it’s not. Acting out one’s need for machismo on a good cause is just selfish.If I were a Flock PR person, I’d be waiting for someone to pull a stunt like this. (Better: they shoot it.)
> Not property damage! We can't possibly go that far!
Anyone can go that far. The question is if it’s smart. The answer is it’s not. Acting out one’s need for machismo on a good cause is just selfish.
If I were a Flock PR person, I’d be waiting for someone to pull a stunt like this. (Better: they shoot it.)