Comment by alok-g
1 day ago
From the brief description, this sounds to be quite basic. Looking forward to hearing if Terence has treated the explanations differently. :-)
1 day ago
From the brief description, this sounds to be quite basic. Looking forward to hearing if Terence has treated the explanations differently. :-)
Basic … that kind of word give me nightmare in my mind when you talked about maths … still remember a book called “elementary set theory” …
My favorite example is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Number_Theory
"The title is the same as that of a very well-known book by Professor L. E. Dickson (with which ours has little in common). We proposed at one time to change it to 'An introduction to arithmetic', a more novel and in some ways a more appropriate title; but it was pointed out that this might lead to misunderstandings about the content of the book."
"The word `basic’ in the title is closer in meaning to `foundational’ rather than `elementary’ [...]" (quoted from that same wikipedia page).
The one math majors joke about is Serra’s A Course in Arithmetic, which is definitely not for young children.
I remember a joke along the lines of "elementary" meaning that someone somewhere has solved it before.
"Any question in maths is either unsolved or obvious."
> this sounds to be quite basic.
It should be according to Tao's own comment at the bottom of the blog:
"This book is for a general audience, without necessarily having a college-level math education. It is aimed more at adults than at children, but some children with an interest in mathematics may be able to get something of it."
I just really liked that question and response.