Comment by ranger_danger 2 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_nm_process 4 comments ranger_danger Reply hinkley 2 days ago I still think we should have gone with average gates per square mm as a new yardstick. It would also make sense to the Numbers Go Up people. itopaloglu83 2 days ago It’s going to be quite funny if they can go below 40nm in gate pitch size, because they’ll need to call it 0nm. dogma1138 2 days ago They are moving to angstroms, hence 18A for example. etyhhgfff 1 day ago Another marketing gag could be -1nm
hinkley 2 days ago I still think we should have gone with average gates per square mm as a new yardstick. It would also make sense to the Numbers Go Up people.
itopaloglu83 2 days ago It’s going to be quite funny if they can go below 40nm in gate pitch size, because they’ll need to call it 0nm. dogma1138 2 days ago They are moving to angstroms, hence 18A for example. etyhhgfff 1 day ago Another marketing gag could be -1nm
I still think we should have gone with average gates per square mm as a new yardstick. It would also make sense to the Numbers Go Up people.
It’s going to be quite funny if they can go below 40nm in gate pitch size, because they’ll need to call it 0nm.
They are moving to angstroms, hence 18A for example.
Another marketing gag could be -1nm