Comment by eatonphil 4 days ago Will we also eventually get a generic sync.Map? 3 comments eatonphil Reply darkr 4 days ago It’d be nice to have in stdlib, but it’s pretty trivial to write a generic wrapper for it jeffbee 4 days ago Almost certainly, since the internal HashTrieMap is already generic. But for now this author's package stands in nicely. puzpuzpuz-hn 3 days ago Would be great to see that - there are multiple GH issues for that. But so far, I'm not convinced that Google prioritizes community requests over its own needs.
darkr 4 days ago It’d be nice to have in stdlib, but it’s pretty trivial to write a generic wrapper for it
jeffbee 4 days ago Almost certainly, since the internal HashTrieMap is already generic. But for now this author's package stands in nicely.
puzpuzpuz-hn 3 days ago Would be great to see that - there are multiple GH issues for that. But so far, I'm not convinced that Google prioritizes community requests over its own needs.
It’d be nice to have in stdlib, but it’s pretty trivial to write a generic wrapper for it
Almost certainly, since the internal HashTrieMap is already generic. But for now this author's package stands in nicely.
Would be great to see that - there are multiple GH issues for that. But so far, I'm not convinced that Google prioritizes community requests over its own needs.