Comment by vonneumannstan

4 days ago

You're smoking something funny. They have just shown they are willing to designate a US company as essentially a foreign spy agency because they wanted to try and renegotiate a contract and didn't get what they wanted and that's your reaction?

6 comments

vonneumannstan

Reply
IG_Semmelweiss  4 days ago

>>>> willing to designate a US company as essentially a foreign spy agency

Can you quote where I said that ?

  • mcherm  4 days ago

    You wrote:

    > I'm glad Anthropic is getting a taste of their own medicine.

    I took that to mean that you support the Pentagon's threat which essentially IS to label Anthropic as a national security threat, simply because they wouldn't give the Pentagon the right to use Anthropic's AI to operate weapons or spy on American citizens.

    • IG_Semmelweiss  4 days ago

      Big fish tries to use their might to kill off small fish .

      Anthropic uses big $$ it to become big fish in the AI pond.

      Anthropic just found there are bigger fish in their pond.

      I'm glad Anthropic have been reminded of this. THat doesn't mean I endorse the US govt using law to make companies a "national security threat" , although its an extremelt easy path from: monopolistic to -> active "national security threat".

      Govt can, and in fact, has a mandate to, go after businesses when those businesses threaten a functioning market. Threatening is certainly part of that arsenal.

      That's what anticompetitive rules are all about.

      1 reply →