Comment by IG_Semmelweiss

4 days ago

>>>> willing to designate a US company as essentially a foreign spy agency

Can you quote where I said that ?

5 comments

IG_Semmelweiss

Reply
mcherm  4 days ago

You wrote:

> I'm glad Anthropic is getting a taste of their own medicine.

I took that to mean that you support the Pentagon's threat which essentially IS to label Anthropic as a national security threat, simply because they wouldn't give the Pentagon the right to use Anthropic's AI to operate weapons or spy on American citizens.

  • IG_Semmelweiss  4 days ago

    Big fish tries to use their might to kill off small fish .

    Anthropic uses big $$ it to become big fish in the AI pond.

    Anthropic just found there are bigger fish in their pond.

    I'm glad Anthropic have been reminded of this. THat doesn't mean I endorse the US govt using law to make companies a "national security threat" , although its an extremelt easy path from: monopolistic to -> active "national security threat".

    Govt can, and in fact, has a mandate to, go after businesses when those businesses threaten a functioning market. Threatening is certainly part of that arsenal.

    That's what anticompetitive rules are all about.

    • vonneumannstan  4 days ago

      You are deliberately or accidentally confusing a lot of things here. This is not some anti-monopoly maneuver by the... DEPARTMENT OF WAR.