Comment by schiffern 2 days ago . 6 comments schiffern Reply WJW 2 days ago They mention this later in the article. It's still about 6 tonnes for the battery to store as much effective energy as the diesel tank. schiffern 2 days ago It seemed like the author had moved on from EVs so I thought he was done, but okay. Should've finished I guess.The article still never accounts for the fact that motors+inverters are ~2 tonnes lighter than an engine+transmission. WJW 2 days ago Or your reading comprehension is not good enough. I didn't have any problem finding the paragraph where he author goes into extra detail. Who can say. 2 replies → mschuster91 2 days ago They are addressing that a few pages further down.
WJW 2 days ago They mention this later in the article. It's still about 6 tonnes for the battery to store as much effective energy as the diesel tank. schiffern 2 days ago It seemed like the author had moved on from EVs so I thought he was done, but okay. Should've finished I guess.The article still never accounts for the fact that motors+inverters are ~2 tonnes lighter than an engine+transmission. WJW 2 days ago Or your reading comprehension is not good enough. I didn't have any problem finding the paragraph where he author goes into extra detail. Who can say. 2 replies →
schiffern 2 days ago It seemed like the author had moved on from EVs so I thought he was done, but okay. Should've finished I guess.The article still never accounts for the fact that motors+inverters are ~2 tonnes lighter than an engine+transmission. WJW 2 days ago Or your reading comprehension is not good enough. I didn't have any problem finding the paragraph where he author goes into extra detail. Who can say. 2 replies →
WJW 2 days ago Or your reading comprehension is not good enough. I didn't have any problem finding the paragraph where he author goes into extra detail. Who can say. 2 replies →
They mention this later in the article. It's still about 6 tonnes for the battery to store as much effective energy as the diesel tank.
It seemed like the author had moved on from EVs so I thought he was done, but okay. Should've finished I guess.
The article still never accounts for the fact that motors+inverters are ~2 tonnes lighter than an engine+transmission.
Or your reading comprehension is not good enough. I didn't have any problem finding the paragraph where he author goes into extra detail. Who can say.
2 replies →
They are addressing that a few pages further down.