Comment by esafak
3 days ago
The project does not list portability as a concern. It's for agent use; they are not trying to re-use existing bash code.
3 days ago
The project does not list portability as a concern. It's for agent use; they are not trying to re-use existing bash code.
Before, you said:
> they use it because there's a lot of training material.
Now, you say:
> they are not trying to re-use existing bash code.
Can't you see how this is a contradiction?
---
I'm sorry, I can't continue like this. I want to have meaningful conversations.
Is English your second language? "They" refers to very different things here.
The issue here is not language, is basic understanding of how LLMs are trained, how agents act on that training and what is the role of the shell from a systems perspective.
I can't have a meaningful conversation with someone that doesn't fully grasp those, no matter in which language.