Comment by krapp

15 hours ago

It is called the Department of War because we live under fascism and Congress no longer matters.

All that matters is that everyone calls it the Department of War, and regards it as such, which everyone does.

> All that matters is that everyone calls it the Department of War, and regards it as such, which everyone does.

What you just described is consensus, and framing it as fascism damages the credibility of your stance. There are better arguments to make, which don’t require framing a label update as oppression.

  • I'm not framing consensus as fascism, I'm pointing out what the consensus is within the current fascist framework, and that consensus is that Congress doesn't make the rules anymore. And that consensus is shared by Congress itself.

  • The president has no authority to rename the Department of Defense, but he and his administration demand consensus under the threat of legal consequences.

    Just as one example, they threatened Google when they didn't immediately rename the Gulf of Mexico to the "Gulf of America" on their maps. Other companies now follow their illegal guidance because they know that they will be threatened too if they don't comply.

    There is a word for when the government uses threats to enforce illegal referendums. That word is "Fascism". Denying this is irresponsible, especially in the context of this situation, where the Government is threatening to force a private company to provide services that it doesn't currently provide.

  • Being honest increases credibility, not damages it.

    > framing a label update as oppression

    That strawman damages credibility.