← Back to context

Comment by bubblewand

1 day ago

I'm pretty sure you (and others) are trying to apply some kind of guess at the "supply chain risk" designation, but it means something specific.

Here's the term defined in an official context:

https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/252.239-7018-supply-chain-....

9 comments

bubblewand

Reply
seliopou  1 day ago

That link is broken for me but I assume you meant to link to [0]. I think if there is a “safeguard” in a system, that definitely fits the bill of a supply chain risk. The only vague term here is “adversary”.

[0]: https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/252.239-7018-supply-chain-....

  • layer8  1 day ago

    Working link: https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/252.239-7018-supply-chain-...

    HN separates trailing dots from URLs, so that you can have working URLs at the end of a sentence. Hence you have to percent-encode trailing dots if they are a necessary part of the actual URL. (Same for some other punctuation characters, probably.)

    This behavior is common for auto-hyperlinking of URLs in running text, so it’s bad practice to have such URLs.

  • bubblewand  1 day ago

    Ugh, sorry for the broken link, I even pasted the same string into a new tab to make sure it worked because I thought the period at the end looked weird, and it was fine. Dunno how it got mangled.

    [EDIT] Oh man, yours is like that too? WTF.

    [EDIT2] If I follow your link, hit the 404 page, then add a period at the end of the URL, it does load. God that's strange.