Comment by mmooss
2 days ago
> Isaacman's competence has mostly consisted of (rightfully) throwing is predecessors under the bus.
That's irresponsbility and incompentence in any position, especially at that level of management.
2 days ago
> Isaacman's competence has mostly consisted of (rightfully) throwing is predecessors under the bus.
That's irresponsbility and incompentence in any position, especially at that level of management.
How? He essentially said that the program would not work as designed and would probably kill people. That is both true and necessary to say in order to fix it--these are exactly the lessons NASA (allegedly) learned from Challenger.
The GGP said he threw people under the bus. That's different than making changes to a program.
> true
I don't believe you can know that. Saying it with assurance - by Internet randos or by the NASA administrator - is more a signal of a lack of analysis. Other people aren't idiots and complex technology issues aren't that certain - those are self-serving fairy tales.