← Back to context

Comment by whearyou

15 hours ago

What are the chances that HN is getting astroturfed these days? Are mods strict about it?

I lots of relatively new accounts coming with what seems to me extreme, but altogether pop-culture acceptable opinions

I used to report quite a number of political/ideological-only accounts to mods through email. They're explicitly against the single purpose account rule. They usually got banned or at least warned.

Over the past year or two I reported a number of accounts that are basically pro-Israel-only, they post a ton of comments to any Israel-related thread and either nothing else or very little of anything else. Mods refuse to ban or even warn them, apparently because emotions run high, there are too many of them and there's priority in punishing the most egregious content so relatively mild ones get a pass, and if mods are being accused of being-antisemitic and they ban a bunch of these they would reinforce the image, etc. These are from memory and not exact quotes.

I don't buy it, and I've stopped reporting things to mods. (To be abundantly clear, anti-Israel-only accounts should 100% be banned too, but at least I haven't noticed as many as them. Any other kind of politics-only account should be purged too if the rules are to be believed.)

I think this is probably happening, but also there are just a ton of actual Zionists and Israelis in the tech industry. Unfortunately they visit this site regularly and police it against honest reporting about their crimes.

  • > Unfortunately they visit this site regularly and police it against honest reporting about their crimes.

    I think that's called "disagreeing".

    • That would suggest they respond to claims with counter arguments, as opposed to what they really do which is flag everything they don’t want people to see

    • Today we call that misinformation. Which of course should be totally illegal and in no way protected by free speech.

  • Do keep in mind that basically every single Israeli goes through military training, which includes training in psychological counter-warfare (hasbara). Even the 'cool' Israelis you know in real life are spies at the beckon-and-call of Israel 24/7.

    What I'm trying to say is that this is an intentional part of their strategy. They know what they're doing.

    They probably have a small detachment assigned to every popular-ish website. For the long tail, they have bot farms.

  • [flagged]

    • They don’t treat Israeli* women like a second class citizen.

      They’re totally fine treating gentile women, men and children as cattle. Slaughtered and imprisoned at will.

    • Not wanting to visit a country is not moral justification for killing its people (including women and even grade school girls).

Your account, while 10 years old, only has comments from the past year. It is becoming very hard to tell what accounts are real and which are fake. Social proof of account activity pre-llm (usable) could be a very important thing in the future.

  • > Social proof of account activity pre-llm (usable) could be a very important thing in the future.

    It's already common practice to buy aged accounts with good reputations, so even that doesn't mean much.

HN doesnt have any defense against it, and the userbase is small enough that it would be highly effective.

What are the chances that HN is getting astroturfed these days?

Happens all day every day. There are many AI agents starting discussions and replying to comments. This is how The Crappening started on 4chan. Some of them are just future grifters. Some are training AI (I have replied to a few for fun). Some are propaganda bots. Those running the bots will reply with something equiv to Errrm Proof?? when called out. Without root I can not empirically prove it and the botters know that.

I predict about 2 years before the site will have more AI noise than real people. I have no idea what can be done about it aside from tracking the bots and reporting them via email to Daniel and I don't know what he could or would do. HN has always been very hands off which is mostly good but not for this scenario. If nothing is done it will just be bots grifting and AstroTurfing one another to the benefit of Google SEO and most of the humans would eventually go elsewhere with exception of some die-hards that refuse to recognize the situation.

  • Anonymous internet forums will very likely die out if inference gets another order of magnitude cheaper.

    The only solutions are (1) private forums, (2) strict verification or maybe (3) some sort of "web of trust" thing, if someone manages to make it user friendly and not suck.

    • I agree and my bet is on private and semi-private (invite only) forums making a come back. It is so much easier nowadays with so many Ansible playbooks and Dockerfiles to automate things.

  • we need to start a paywalled private HN forum

    • we need to start a paywalled private HN forum

      In my opinion it would be mostly a ghost town if it requires money for something that was free. It would probably have to be more like a n invite-only semi-private forum. An example would be lobsters. [1] Not sayin' that's perfect, just an example. One can always try it and see what comes of it.

      [1] - https://lobste.rs/

I've seen lots of suspiciously new accounts hoping into these conversations. Saying questionable things.

With things like Openclaw it’s kind of trivial to game forums now. You just have to tell an agent to “post arguments for/against this perspective on this forum.” Give it a few talking points to include if you want to get specific and let it run. Specify the tone so it sounds realistic. It’s literally going to do everything else essentially forever or until you run out of tokens. Comments in a forum are dirt cheap so it’s also going to be very cheap.

  • Youd have to do a lot of work to make sure it's only a few short sentences, non-specific, and ultra-quippy though.

    I mean I'm sure it can be done but if you ask an LLM to produce comment reply without more instruction it's going to write something a lot more thoughtful, respectful, and substantive than a forum user would.

language question: what does astroturfed mean here? (i know that astroturf is artificial grass.)

  • It's when people (or bots) acting in bad faith make a lot of noise to make it seem like there is a strong support for some (usually bad) position. It' a play on the term "grassroots". Fake grassroots=astroturfing

I mean does it matter?

At this point, lines have been drawn. In conservative land, everything conservative is good, everything liberal is bad. So the only sane position to take is the complete opposite.

For example, if you see someone self proclaimed liberal being critical of liberals, that person is probably a conservative or its a conservative bot.

What? DEFINITELY astro turfed if you know what to look for.

At the very least by Chinese agents or useful idi*ts. The amount (or, alternatively, visibility) of Chinese apologists in this website is totally disproportionate)

  • Did you mean to say Israeli? Cause that's what it seems like to me. The level of misinformation is staggering.