Comment by rayiner 8 hours ago Who decides what’s moral in a democracy? You? 3 comments rayiner Reply thunderfork 7 hours ago Human beings all and each have the agency to make this choice for themselves. rayiner 7 hours ago So individuals have a “duty … to sabotage their country when it becomes immoral” according to individually-defined standards of morality? That seems like an unworkable way to run any society with more than a few people. praptak 2 hours ago In practice the opposite is true. There's not enough people willing to sabotage countries like 1933 Germany or Putin's Russia.
thunderfork 7 hours ago Human beings all and each have the agency to make this choice for themselves. rayiner 7 hours ago So individuals have a “duty … to sabotage their country when it becomes immoral” according to individually-defined standards of morality? That seems like an unworkable way to run any society with more than a few people. praptak 2 hours ago In practice the opposite is true. There's not enough people willing to sabotage countries like 1933 Germany or Putin's Russia.
rayiner 7 hours ago So individuals have a “duty … to sabotage their country when it becomes immoral” according to individually-defined standards of morality? That seems like an unworkable way to run any society with more than a few people. praptak 2 hours ago In practice the opposite is true. There's not enough people willing to sabotage countries like 1933 Germany or Putin's Russia.
praptak 2 hours ago In practice the opposite is true. There's not enough people willing to sabotage countries like 1933 Germany or Putin's Russia.
Human beings all and each have the agency to make this choice for themselves.
So individuals have a “duty … to sabotage their country when it becomes immoral” according to individually-defined standards of morality? That seems like an unworkable way to run any society with more than a few people.
In practice the opposite is true. There's not enough people willing to sabotage countries like 1933 Germany or Putin's Russia.