Comment by jacquesm 10 hours ago Unlike oil companies who would of course never do such a thing. 4 comments jacquesm Reply lkbm 10 hours ago They sure do. They've also been sued for it, too, because it's bad. It's also bad for Greenpeace to do it. jacquesm 8 hours ago There is absolutely no way the damage is that large and this seems to be mostly a revenge action by a community in which Greenpeace - or any other environmental organization - would never get a fair trial to begin with. terminalshort 4 hours ago The article doesn't mention it, but it could be punitive damages b112 10 hours ago The climate can't sue if you lie about it.Companies and people can.
lkbm 10 hours ago They sure do. They've also been sued for it, too, because it's bad. It's also bad for Greenpeace to do it. jacquesm 8 hours ago There is absolutely no way the damage is that large and this seems to be mostly a revenge action by a community in which Greenpeace - or any other environmental organization - would never get a fair trial to begin with. terminalshort 4 hours ago The article doesn't mention it, but it could be punitive damages
jacquesm 8 hours ago There is absolutely no way the damage is that large and this seems to be mostly a revenge action by a community in which Greenpeace - or any other environmental organization - would never get a fair trial to begin with. terminalshort 4 hours ago The article doesn't mention it, but it could be punitive damages
They sure do. They've also been sued for it, too, because it's bad. It's also bad for Greenpeace to do it.
There is absolutely no way the damage is that large and this seems to be mostly a revenge action by a community in which Greenpeace - or any other environmental organization - would never get a fair trial to begin with.
The article doesn't mention it, but it could be punitive damages
The climate can't sue if you lie about it.
Companies and people can.