Comment by wvenable
5 hours ago
But the reasoning for that was a preference for DST.
Obviously all this is arbitrary including standard time.
5 hours ago
But the reasoning for that was a preference for DST.
Obviously all this is arbitrary including standard time.
> But the reasoning for that was a preference for DST.
There was no reasoning for the Dubya alteration: the change was not debated anywhere, and (AIUI) no one was ever able to figure out how it actually got slipped into the legislation.
The DST extension was included in Section 110 of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, debated as part of the bill, and justified on energy-savings grounds. Congress even required the Department of Energy to study its impact afterwards!