Comment by ceejayoz 2 days ago That's more perks than the job Constitutionally awards. It was created as a powerless placeholder role. 3 comments ceejayoz Reply lapcat 2 days ago You're missing the point, which is that by all accounts, Al Gore was a close advisor to Bill Clinton. ceejayoz 2 days ago And by all accounts, he pushed for action on climate change.As it turns out, close advisors still don't get to set policy. lapcat 2 days ago Another interpretation is that Gore engaged primarily in symbolism.The Kyoto Protocol itself was primarily symbolic, with little or no enforcement mechanism.
lapcat 2 days ago You're missing the point, which is that by all accounts, Al Gore was a close advisor to Bill Clinton. ceejayoz 2 days ago And by all accounts, he pushed for action on climate change.As it turns out, close advisors still don't get to set policy. lapcat 2 days ago Another interpretation is that Gore engaged primarily in symbolism.The Kyoto Protocol itself was primarily symbolic, with little or no enforcement mechanism.
ceejayoz 2 days ago And by all accounts, he pushed for action on climate change.As it turns out, close advisors still don't get to set policy. lapcat 2 days ago Another interpretation is that Gore engaged primarily in symbolism.The Kyoto Protocol itself was primarily symbolic, with little or no enforcement mechanism.
lapcat 2 days ago Another interpretation is that Gore engaged primarily in symbolism.The Kyoto Protocol itself was primarily symbolic, with little or no enforcement mechanism.
You're missing the point, which is that by all accounts, Al Gore was a close advisor to Bill Clinton.
And by all accounts, he pushed for action on climate change.
As it turns out, close advisors still don't get to set policy.
Another interpretation is that Gore engaged primarily in symbolism.
The Kyoto Protocol itself was primarily symbolic, with little or no enforcement mechanism.