Comment by galaxyLogic 5 months ago True. But if I was a judge I might want to consult AI to get a "neutral" opinion. 3 comments galaxyLogic Reply CrazyStat 5 months ago AI "neutrality" is a mirage. Hopefully the Supreme Court justices are smart enough to know that. galaxyLogic 5 months ago Hopefully. If they are smart they know that everybody can be wrong, therefore it is good to hear differing opinions and argumentation from multiple sources, in important matters. CrazyStat 5 months ago Yes, that’s why they have lawyers submit briefs and make oral arguments.
CrazyStat 5 months ago AI "neutrality" is a mirage. Hopefully the Supreme Court justices are smart enough to know that. galaxyLogic 5 months ago Hopefully. If they are smart they know that everybody can be wrong, therefore it is good to hear differing opinions and argumentation from multiple sources, in important matters. CrazyStat 5 months ago Yes, that’s why they have lawyers submit briefs and make oral arguments.
galaxyLogic 5 months ago Hopefully. If they are smart they know that everybody can be wrong, therefore it is good to hear differing opinions and argumentation from multiple sources, in important matters. CrazyStat 5 months ago Yes, that’s why they have lawyers submit briefs and make oral arguments.
AI "neutrality" is a mirage. Hopefully the Supreme Court justices are smart enough to know that.
Hopefully. If they are smart they know that everybody can be wrong, therefore it is good to hear differing opinions and argumentation from multiple sources, in important matters.
Yes, that’s why they have lawyers submit briefs and make oral arguments.