Comment by ActorNightly 19 hours ago Compared to Windows sure. Compared to linux, its incredibly bloated. 4 comments ActorNightly Reply numpad0 17 hours ago Objectively untrue. Classic MacOS with GUI could be run under <1MB RAM. Linux without GUI both officially and actually required >2MB. fulafel 9 hours ago Linux in 896 kB: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~brians/comp/linux-lite.html ActorNightly 12 hours ago Yeah and everyone seems to forget how insanely slow Macs were. detourdog 16 hours ago My first Mac had only 128k. The real drag was swapping floppies.
numpad0 17 hours ago Objectively untrue. Classic MacOS with GUI could be run under <1MB RAM. Linux without GUI both officially and actually required >2MB. fulafel 9 hours ago Linux in 896 kB: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~brians/comp/linux-lite.html ActorNightly 12 hours ago Yeah and everyone seems to forget how insanely slow Macs were. detourdog 16 hours ago My first Mac had only 128k. The real drag was swapping floppies.
Objectively untrue. Classic MacOS with GUI could be run under <1MB RAM. Linux without GUI both officially and actually required >2MB.
Linux in 896 kB: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~brians/comp/linux-lite.html
Yeah and everyone seems to forget how insanely slow Macs were.
My first Mac had only 128k. The real drag was swapping floppies.