Comment by bigfishrunning

9 hours ago

They can't be that blatant, that's how you lose your next term

The second term for the "drain the swamp" president implies otherwise (it did take another cycle, but that arguably had more to do with covid than corruption).

  • That's because his opponent and her party were fully behind and financing a genocide in Gaza at the time.

    • I find it hard to imagine any evidence-based viewpoint in 2024 that would have led to a conclusion that Trump would be better for Gaza. The two party system doesn't give any room for choices on some issues, but that's hardly an argument that the two choices are equivalent overall.