Comment by ph4rsikal 9 days ago LangChain is not over-engineered; it's not engineered at all. Pure Chaos. 3 comments ph4rsikal Reply embedding-shape 9 days ago Much like how "literally" doesn't literally mean "literally" anymore, "over-engineered" in most cases doesn't mean "too much engineering happened" but "wrong design/abstractions", which of course translates to "designs/abstractions I don't like". fartfeatures 9 days ago Under-engineered is a much better term. rdedev 8 days ago I wish job openings for anything LLM related would stop asking for experience with langchain
embedding-shape 9 days ago Much like how "literally" doesn't literally mean "literally" anymore, "over-engineered" in most cases doesn't mean "too much engineering happened" but "wrong design/abstractions", which of course translates to "designs/abstractions I don't like". fartfeatures 9 days ago Under-engineered is a much better term.
rdedev 8 days ago I wish job openings for anything LLM related would stop asking for experience with langchain
Much like how "literally" doesn't literally mean "literally" anymore, "over-engineered" in most cases doesn't mean "too much engineering happened" but "wrong design/abstractions", which of course translates to "designs/abstractions I don't like".
Under-engineered is a much better term.
I wish job openings for anything LLM related would stop asking for experience with langchain