Comment by defrost
18 hours ago
Singapore is currently claiming title of "world's largest (and tallest) indoor vertical farm" with a five story, two hectare automated racked site (Jan 2026):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJuo6Te1fM4 (2.5 minutes)
18 hours ago
Singapore is currently claiming title of "world's largest (and tallest) indoor vertical farm" with a five story, two hectare automated racked site (Jan 2026):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJuo6Te1fM4 (2.5 minutes)
I wonder if they are profitable, or if some sort of government support is involved. I don't think power for all those lights is particularly cheap in Singapore, and the competition in the surrounding countries has cheap labor and lots of free sun and rain.
Bringing necessities (water, food, energy) local is worth subsidizing. For those who doubt, just look at current events. Two morons with the right levers can upend countless critical processes.
If you look closely enough, everything is government supported. However farming is explicitly government subsidised everywhere.
That's a hard thing to have introspection in as just about every productive source of food probably has some government support.
Just about everywhere has understood "bread and circuses" and "let them eat cake" to the point of monetarily promoting food production.
One of the big distinctions between feudalism and extreme capitalism in my mind is forgetting this.
There have been vertical farms in Singapore that went bankrupt previously. I don’t think this model has worked very well in general globally, compared to traditional farms. This particular one is producing insanely expensive produce. For example the lettuce that is mentioned is over $14 a pound. It’s also a hydroponic farm which means only some crops can be grown.