Comment by NegativeLatency 2 months ago Didn’t want to upgrade the memory? 2 comments NegativeLatency Reply jazzyjackson 2 months ago It’s the speed of the JavaScript compiler, on those old browsers they were expected to handle a few kilobytes max of event listeners. The chrome vs Firefox browser wars sped up JavaScript compilation by 10x at least NegativeLatency 2 months ago Yes I was alive for that. Just said that because that Mac could take up to 1.5GB of RAM
jazzyjackson 2 months ago It’s the speed of the JavaScript compiler, on those old browsers they were expected to handle a few kilobytes max of event listeners. The chrome vs Firefox browser wars sped up JavaScript compilation by 10x at least NegativeLatency 2 months ago Yes I was alive for that. Just said that because that Mac could take up to 1.5GB of RAM
NegativeLatency 2 months ago Yes I was alive for that. Just said that because that Mac could take up to 1.5GB of RAM
It’s the speed of the JavaScript compiler, on those old browsers they were expected to handle a few kilobytes max of event listeners. The chrome vs Firefox browser wars sped up JavaScript compilation by 10x at least
Yes I was alive for that. Just said that because that Mac could take up to 1.5GB of RAM