Comment by jacquesm 16 hours ago The proper metric is the defect escape rate. 3 comments jacquesm Reply exidex 16 hours ago Now you have to count defects jacquesm 16 hours ago You have to do that anyway, and in fact you probably were already doing that. If you do not track this then you are leaving a lot on the table. exidex 13 hours ago I was more thinking in terms of creating a benchmark which would optimized during training. For regular projects, I agree, you have to count that anyway
exidex 16 hours ago Now you have to count defects jacquesm 16 hours ago You have to do that anyway, and in fact you probably were already doing that. If you do not track this then you are leaving a lot on the table. exidex 13 hours ago I was more thinking in terms of creating a benchmark which would optimized during training. For regular projects, I agree, you have to count that anyway
jacquesm 16 hours ago You have to do that anyway, and in fact you probably were already doing that. If you do not track this then you are leaving a lot on the table. exidex 13 hours ago I was more thinking in terms of creating a benchmark which would optimized during training. For regular projects, I agree, you have to count that anyway
exidex 13 hours ago I was more thinking in terms of creating a benchmark which would optimized during training. For regular projects, I agree, you have to count that anyway
Now you have to count defects
You have to do that anyway, and in fact you probably were already doing that. If you do not track this then you are leaving a lot on the table.
I was more thinking in terms of creating a benchmark which would optimized during training. For regular projects, I agree, you have to count that anyway