Comment by Dylan16807

5 days ago

Option A isn't really the status quo. The status quo has a bunch of sites doing invasive checks and other sites region blocking users.

> Only large incumbents will have no trouble paying for the measures required to ensure compliance.

Oh my gawwwwwd. People trot this out any time any regulation is mentioned. Option B is a single easily accessible age category value. It's simpler than the status quo.

11 comments

Dylan16807

Reply
fn-mote  5 days ago

> Option B is […] simpler than the status quo.

This bill FORBIDS platforms from operating in the state unless they provide age verification.

Forbid an OS for operating in Illinois? Sounds insane to me. When I bring my Linux laptop from California, what happens?

  • Dylan16807  5 days ago

    I'm not really focused on the exact wording of this bill. But mandating distros have a useradd and glibc with an extra couple functions is not a significant burden.

    • marcus_holmes  5 days ago

      So... a pinky swear then, right?

      I mean, how is the OS going to actually verify the age of the operator?

      I see how this helps Facebook - if you lie to the OS, and the OS tells Facebook that you're over 18, then it's not Facebook's fault if they provide you an 18+ service.

      I don't see how this helps anyone else.

      7 replies →

    • sgarland  5 days ago

      I hope the number of downvotes you’re receiving makes you consider the absurdity of your suggestion.

      Have you seen distrowatch? Are you going to go track down maintainers from every distro - many of whom live outside of the U.S. - and demand they implement this? The smaller ones would probably ignore you or tell you to get fucked, the larger ones with funding might decide to drag you into court.