Comment by coryrc

3 days ago

Almonds are climate-appropriate product and valuable. Alfalfa can cheaply be grown off rainwater in the Midwest and it alone frees up sufficient water.

The problem is alfalfa is expensive to transport (heavy due to desired moisture content). So while it can be cheaply grown in the Midwest, it can't be cheaply transported from the Midwest to where buyers of alfalfa are (typically overseas).

Alfalfa is also a staple for crop rotation, so any farming operation will still grow some alfalfa to maintain rotation for good soil health (or during bad condition seasons since it's hardier to poor conditions and not a permanent crop).

If alfalfa cannot be exported (through policy or economic conditions), the low price attracts more livestock production in-state (which would be even worse for water use).

Those things makes it a hard crop to target for sustainability and export.

  • > it can't be cheaply transported from the Midwest to where buyers of alfalfa are

    Trains.

    Alfalfa isn't the only alternative, and they should switch to higher-value crops anyway. They would if they had to pay for water. We simply need to charge everybody for water usage.

    • The problem is alfalfa is a high value crop and a water efficient crop relative to value.

      So as water/weather gets more unpredictable and beef/dairy rises in price, alfalfa becomes even more attractive to grow.