Comment by dclowd9901 3 days ago I get that it is neat but it's hardly the Hoover dam is it? 4 comments dclowd9901 Reply darknavi 3 days ago It's not exactly brain surgery, is it?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THNPmhBl-8I dontlikeyoueith 3 days ago No, it's significantly more complex. thaumasiotes 2 days ago More complex for less benefit is just losing two different ways. creddit 3 days ago May be more complex but it's less audacious.The water systems for LA and San Francisco are really quite audacious even if they have less technical complexity than floating rail.I've built ML systems way more complex than any of these but it's still way less ambitious and audacious.
darknavi 3 days ago It's not exactly brain surgery, is it?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THNPmhBl-8I
dontlikeyoueith 3 days ago No, it's significantly more complex. thaumasiotes 2 days ago More complex for less benefit is just losing two different ways. creddit 3 days ago May be more complex but it's less audacious.The water systems for LA and San Francisco are really quite audacious even if they have less technical complexity than floating rail.I've built ML systems way more complex than any of these but it's still way less ambitious and audacious.
creddit 3 days ago May be more complex but it's less audacious.The water systems for LA and San Francisco are really quite audacious even if they have less technical complexity than floating rail.I've built ML systems way more complex than any of these but it's still way less ambitious and audacious.
It's not exactly brain surgery, is it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THNPmhBl-8I
No, it's significantly more complex.
More complex for less benefit is just losing two different ways.
May be more complex but it's less audacious.
The water systems for LA and San Francisco are really quite audacious even if they have less technical complexity than floating rail.
I've built ML systems way more complex than any of these but it's still way less ambitious and audacious.