Comment by JasonADrury 6 months ago The purpose of a thing is what it does. 6 comments JasonADrury Reply throwingcookies 6 months ago > The purpose of a thing is what it does.What is the purpose of the DDoS JS in the archive website then? Not DDoS? JasonADrury 6 months ago I'm sure it's DDoS, just like the purpose of gyrovague.com is to attack archive.todayEasy stuff, no? ahhhhnoooo 6 months ago Attack? Did we read the same one article? One article is clearly defensive. The other is a piece of investigative journalism about who and how the site is run.Neither of those is an attack. 3 replies →
throwingcookies 6 months ago > The purpose of a thing is what it does.What is the purpose of the DDoS JS in the archive website then? Not DDoS? JasonADrury 6 months ago I'm sure it's DDoS, just like the purpose of gyrovague.com is to attack archive.todayEasy stuff, no? ahhhhnoooo 6 months ago Attack? Did we read the same one article? One article is clearly defensive. The other is a piece of investigative journalism about who and how the site is run.Neither of those is an attack. 3 replies →
JasonADrury 6 months ago I'm sure it's DDoS, just like the purpose of gyrovague.com is to attack archive.todayEasy stuff, no? ahhhhnoooo 6 months ago Attack? Did we read the same one article? One article is clearly defensive. The other is a piece of investigative journalism about who and how the site is run.Neither of those is an attack. 3 replies →
ahhhhnoooo 6 months ago Attack? Did we read the same one article? One article is clearly defensive. The other is a piece of investigative journalism about who and how the site is run.Neither of those is an attack. 3 replies →
> The purpose of a thing is what it does.
What is the purpose of the DDoS JS in the archive website then? Not DDoS?
I'm sure it's DDoS, just like the purpose of gyrovague.com is to attack archive.today
Easy stuff, no?
Attack? Did we read the same one article? One article is clearly defensive. The other is a piece of investigative journalism about who and how the site is run.
Neither of those is an attack.
3 replies →