Comment by JasonADrury
6 months ago
Archive.org has an even worse history of this, FWIW.
It allows website owners and third parties to tamper with archived content.
Look here, for example: https://web.archive.org/web/20140701040026/http://echo.msk.r...
Archive.today is by far the best option available.
What does this example show? It shows „ad blocker detected“ for me.
Archived page from 2014 gets tampered with by this javascript from 2022: https://web.archive.org/web/20220912152218/http://echobanner...
Unless you're very technical, web.archive.org is completely untrustworthy
Deflection rather than addressing the actual accusation
Pay attention to this type of behavior, folks. It's revealing
What do you want me to address? I'm just pointing out that there are no great archival services, and the only real alternative to archive.today is worse.
>Pay attention to this type of behavior, folks. It's revealing
What does it reveal?
Lmao, did you just start bickering with yourself?
Or, wow, you just revealed your second account.
4 replies →