Comment by MetaWhirledPeas

2 days ago

> real-world identity

This bit sounds like dystopian governance, antithetical to most open source philosophies.

Would you drive on bridges or ride in elevators "inspected" by anons? Why are our standards for digital infrastructure and software "engineering" so low?

I don't blame the anons but the people blindly pulling in anon dependencies. The anons don't owe us anything.

  • This option is available already in the form of closed-source proprietary software.

    If someone wants a package manager where all projects mandate verifiable ID that's fine, but I don't see that getting many contributors. And I also don't see that stopping people using fraudulent IDs.

  • A business or government can (should) separately package, review, and audit code without involving upstream developers or maintainers at all.