Comment by croon

Huge IANAL disclaimer to start, but your post started off with:

> No. For it to be securities fraud, Arm would need to make a materially false statement of fact that misleads investors. Naming the CPU in this way doesn't clear the bar because:...

The EVP statement doesn't say "our CPU does AGI", sure, but is it unfair to suggest it makes some form av AGI claim, which isn't there from the naming alone?

It's no longer your point A) "clearly product brand" if the established usage of the term "AGI" comes out of the EVP's mouth.

And yes, their (albeit very vague) claim is clearly wrong IMHO.