Comment by radu_floricica

For now. The term people use is "centaur", like the half-man-half-horse of mythology.

The AI CEO's are pointing out that when chess was "solved", in that Kasparov was famously beaten by deep blue, there was a window of time after that event where grandmasters + computers were the strongest players. The knowledge/experience of a grandmaster paired with the search/scoring of the engines was an unbeatable pair.

However, that was just a window in time. Eventually engines alone were capable of beating grandmaster + engine pairs. Think about that carefully. It implies something. The human involvement eventually became an impediment.

Whether you believe this will transfer to other domains is up to you to decide.

Fine but 'learn to work with Claude' helps only until you stop checking it and start borrowing its confidence. Then you chase a bogus lemma for hours.

It's like pairing with the fastest person on the team, except he is wrong often enough to cost you time and still sounds sure.

[dead]