Comment by Retr0id
3 days ago
This just looks like regular fizzbuzz written a bunch of different ways (by AI...), whereas the gimmick of the original FizzBuzzEnterpriseEdition was that it had a lot of unnecessary abstraction: https://github.com/enterprisequalitycoding/fizzbuzzenterpris...
What sets this apart is the scale of overengineering. The original was of course the inspiration.
You misunderstand the definition of overengineering.
Fair point - there are two kinds of overengineering. FizzBuzzEnterpriseEdition satirizes abstraction for abstraction's sake (AbstractStrategyFactory etc). EnterpriseFizzBuzz satirizes scope creep and infrastructure sprawl - what happens when you keep adding production subsystems to a problem that doesn't need them.
The subsystems aren't just alternative FizzBuzz implementations. The blockchain records FizzBuzz evaluations in a cryptographically linked ledger. The Paxos consensus reaches distributed agreement on whether 15 is FizzBuzz. The compliance framework creates a genuine regulatory paradox: GDPR demands deletion of records that SOX requires to be immutable and the blockchain can't remove. The on-call rotation formula (epoch_hours // 168) % 1 has returned "Bob McFizzington" for every rotation since 1970.
Different joke, same target.
6 replies →