Comment by Ms-J

9 hours ago

Play store is the largest distributor of spyware and viruses for Android.

Not even a small fraction of a percentage of scams come from installing software normally, but only from Google Play store.

This raises the question: Why publish web pages that discuss topics such as "sideloading". Who would be interested in that information

Who (besides you) reads googleblog.com, androidauthority.com and other sites that discuss these topics

Is it only a small fraction of a percentage of Android users

When Google makes the obviously bogus argument that Google Play policies, e.g., "sideloaoding" restrictions, are intended to "protect users", who is it addressing. Who is the audience. Is it the "average" Android user that Google claims to be protecting. Is it Android users who prefer F-Droid and not need Google's "help" in avoiding scams

What if Google Play policies protect Google from competition (cf. protecting users from scams) and this could have an effect on the stock price or on the profits of "app developers" or "ad tech" companies. Who would be interested in that information. Who would accept bogus claims about "protecting users" without question

Yeah. I had to remove malware from family phones because they installed the wrong "QR Code Scanner" out of the trillions of copies on the play store, which contained malware that somehow replaced the launcher on a Samsung phone and then showed ads all over the place. The Play store is fucking malware, Google services are malware, and the family member now uses a Pixel 9a with GrapheneOS which makes normie phone usage riskless and clean again. Fuck Google for Gaslighting us all with this Sideload change.

  • Stories like this is all my family members get iPhones. If Google wants to move to a walled garden too it should at least deliver on the walled garden benefits. No point otherwise.

    • Apple will enshittify at some point. The only long term way to go is open source.

  • Oh man, my grandpa also had an app replace the launcher on his phone! I forget what exactly it was pushing but needless to say it's been removed.

  • I really like f-droid in this case because I can be so much more sure about using an app there than from play-store

    > Play store is the largest distributor of spyware and viruses for Android.

    I think all companies are taking part in somewhat of a double-speak. Meta is lobbying for child safety and so many other things.

    I feel like they really can't come up loud and say what exact reasons they are doing this (for locking down Android) and thus have to use this as an excuse.

    It's all smokescreens and mirror to a certain degree.

    • They are (primarily) doing it because a few governments asked / forced them to. THe scams you see in the iPhone-heavy US are very different than the scams you see in other places.

> Not even a small fraction of a percentage of scams come from installing software normally, but only from Google Play store.

This change is not about stopping malware/scams. Malware/scams is just the gaslighting excuse for the change.

The actual reason for the change is to try to protect playstore profits. With the lawsuit that forced them to allow alternate "stores" they saw the money stream shrinking, and this is their attempt at propping up the money flow for as long as possible.